USPTO serial 76160409
NYCYBERCENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NYCYBERCENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary M Rosenberg
GARY M ROSENBERG ROSENBERG & ESTIS PC733 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | COMMERCIAL BUILDING SERVICES OFFERING SECURE STATE-OF-THE-ART FACILITIES SUITABLE FOR AND DEDICATED TO TENANTS THAT ARE TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES OR COMPANIES WITH NEED FOR INTENSIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 2000 |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION, DESIGN AND TESTING FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF COMMERCIAL BUILDING, NAMELY, SECURE STATE-OF-THE-ART FACILITIES SUITABLE FOR AND DEDICATED TO TENANTS THAT ARE TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES OR COMPANIES WITH NEED FOR INTENSIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |