Drawing for AXTRA

USPTO serial 76160617

AXTRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AXTRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LN FL 4ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Semiconductor devices, namely, sram which is also known as static random access memory, dram which is also known as dynamic random access memory, and soc which is also known as system on a chip, masks which are groups of films to be used to proceed the integrate components production, multimedia systems, namely, cd-rom, interface cards, printed circuit boards, and integrated circuitsACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture for others of computer hardware, computer software, telecommunications hardware, telecommunications software, and electronic and optical components for computing and communicatingACTIVE—
042Design for others of computer hardware, computer software, telecommunications hardware, telecommunications software, and electronic and optical components for computing and communicatingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 15, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance