USPTO serial 76160672
RETURN ON ERGONOMICS (ROE)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RETURN ON ERGONOMICS (ROE)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
T. Michael Davis
Kyle T. Peterson PATTERSON, THUENTE, SKAAR & CHRISTENSEN,80th South 8th Street4800 IDS CENTERMinneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | namely, pre-recorded videocassette tapes, pre-programmed CD ROM presentations, and interactive computer webpages containing information on ergonomic products, ergonomic services, and proper body mechanics | ACTIVE | Oct 12, 2000 |
| 010 | namely, back supports, wrist supports, anti-vibration gloves, tennis elbow supports, back cushion supports, lumbar roll supports, body protection pads, ankle supports, wrist wraps, wrist sleeve wraps, ankle wraps, knee sleeves, thigh sleeves, calf sleeves, elbow sleeves, ankle sleeves, foot supports, insoles, industrial seating, kneepads, thermal vests, thermal wraps, wrist rests, computer mouse pads, computer mouse trays, copy and disk holders, computer glare filters, computer glare accessories, keyboard managers, computer monitor risers, and patient transfer devices, all for the protection from strain and injury | ACTIVE | Oct 12, 2000 |
| 016 | namely, printed matter including pamphlets, brochures, booklets, workbook materials, posters, and printed educational and training materials featuring information and instruction of an educational nature | ACTIVE | Oct 12, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |