USPTO serial 76161220
NAPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2619947Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 17, 2002
- Examiner
- COOK, BRADLEY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NAPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
A-MAX TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED
Hong Kong, HK
A-MAX TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED
Kwun Tong, Kowloon, HK
A-MAX TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED
Kwun Tong, Kowloon, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN B HORWITZ
A MAX TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED2A METEX HOUSE28 FUI YIU KOK STREETTSUEN WAN,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video display cards; video graphics accelerator cards; video capture cards; television tuner cards; television tuner capture cards; computer mainboards; computer system motherboards; electronic circuit cards for use with facsimile machines and modems; internal and external modems; audio sound cards; computer hardware for generating and reproducing sounds with sound cards; audio speakers; sound amplifiers; computer hardware; computer peripheral devices, namely, computer mice and microphones; portable audio devices, namely, portable compact disc players, MP3 players and related manuals sold therewith | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by A-MAX TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by A-MAX TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by A-MAX TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NAPA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2011 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |