USPTO serial 76161470
LEGACY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 29, 2012
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LEGACY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN JOSE DOS CAMPOS, BR
EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
San Jose dos Campos, BR
Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
San Jose dos Campos, BR
Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
San Jose dos Campos, BR
Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Duane M. Byers
Duane M. Byers Nixon & Vanderhye PC901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of aircraft, aircraft engines and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named LEGACY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |