USPTO serial 76161485
EMFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vaajakoski, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda S Chan
LINDA S CHAN KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSENMAN575 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-2585UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC SENSOR DEVICES, NAMELY OCCUPANCY SENSORS FOR USE IN DETERMINING WHETHER A PERSON IS INSIDE A ROOM OR IN A BED OR LEAVING A BED FOR USE IN HOSPITALS AND NURSING HOMES; ELECTRONIC SENSOR DEVICES FOR MONITORING THE LEVEL OF FOOT TRAFFIC OR VEHICLE TRAFFIC ENTERING AND EXITING A GIVEN AREA OR MEASURING VEHICLE TRAFFIC OR SPEED OR LOCATION ON A TRACK OF A ROAD OR STREET; TOUCH-SENSITIVE ELECTRONIC SENSOR DEVICES FOR SWITCHING ON AND OFF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; AND, ELECTRONIC SENSOR DEVICES FOR USE IN ELECTRONIC KEYPADS FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; ACTUATORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |