USPTO serial 76161777
FASTCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FASTCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah K Henscheid
DEBORAH K HENSCHEID SNELL & WILMER LLPAZ CTR INTELLECT PROPERTY DEPT400 E VAN BUREN STPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2223Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | External modems for use with point-of-sale terminal systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |