Drawing for BREAKING THE DIGITAL CEILING

USPTO serial 76161962

BREAKING THE DIGITAL CEILING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEIZEAR, LISA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BREAKING THE DIGITAL CEILING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NONE

DRENA PRYOR PRESIDENT8954 WHITTAKER AVENORTHRIDGE, CA 91343UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041education and entertainment services, namely, services rendered by persons or institutions in the development of the mental faculties of persons, as well as services intended to amuse or to engage the attention of personsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Apr 19, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Nov 9, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Oct 29, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance