USPTO serial 76162031
MICROSELECTRON-HDR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2710489Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 29, 2003
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICROSELECTRON-HDR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
3905 TH Veenendaal, NL
3905 TH Veenendaal, NL
3905 TH Veenendaal, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Lasky
Michael B. Lasky ALTERA LAW GROUP LLC220 South Sixth Street1700 US Bank Plaza SouthMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and instruments for research and development of cancer treatment, namely, computer hardware, software and firmware programs that control and monitor brachytherapy treatments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments to give high dose rate brachytherapy to patients with prostate, gynecological, lung, esophagus, skin, breast, rectal, skin, nasopharynx and head and neck cancer or with endovascular lesions, namely, a remote afterloader with a treatment unit containing a high dose rate source attached to a source cable, with a control system comprising software and firmware programs, with connections to implantable applicators that serve as source channels into the anatomy and with components for control and monitoring in peripheral locations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nucletron B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Nucletron B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Nucletron B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named MICROSELECTRON-HDR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 15, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 1, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |