USPTO serial 76162341
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
VIVENDI UNIVERSAL GAMES CANADA LTD.
LOS ANGELES, CA
Other trademarks owned by VIVENDI UNIVERSAL GAMES CANADA LTD.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod A. Rigole, Esq.
ROD A RIGOLE ESQ VIVENDI UNIVERSAL GAMES INC6060 CTR DR 5TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer and video game software; computer game programs; computer game software that is downloadable from a global computer network; video game software for use on a computer or video game console; interactive video game programs; computer and video game discs; computer and video game cassettes; computer and video game cartridges; instruction manuals supplied as a unit with the foregoing; cinematographic films; motion picture films for broadcast in theaters, on television, over the internet, and on video and DVD | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | mechanical toys; plastic character toys; rubber character toys; plush toys; squeeze toys; wind-up toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for the posting and exchange of messages among computer users concerning computer games, computer gaming, the computer gaming industry, and interactive entertainment; providing on-line chat rooms for the transmission of messages, data, and motion video among computer users, concerning computer games, computer gaming, the computer gaming industry, and interactive entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing on-line gaming; providing information in the field of on-line entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer support services, namely, provision of technical assistance and technical support, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; computer software design services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |