Drawing for UNIVERSAL LASER

USPTO serial 76162472

UNIVERSAL LASER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIVERSAL LASER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles C Fowler

CHARLES C FOWLER LYON & LYON LLP633 W 5TH ST STE 4700LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Mail order services, mail order catalog services, and on-site retail store services all in the field of office suppliesACTIVE
037Maintenance and/or repair of office equipment, namely, copiers, fax machines, printers, and computersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
May 27, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance