Drawing for DOTMUSIC

USPTO serial 76162974

DOTMUSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOTMUSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy C. DiConza

NANCY C DICONZA FROSS ZELNICK LEBRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publication in the nature of a magazine in the field of music and entertainment; downloadable musical sound recordingACTIVE—
016Printed matter, namely magazines in the field of music and entertainmentACTIVE—
035Advertising services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements on web sitesACTIVE—
039Travel agency services, namely, making reservation and bookings for transportation and arranging travel toursACTIVE—
041Providing information in the fields of music and entertainment namely, news, interviews, music-ranking charts, discographies, biographies and reviews relating to musical recordings, musical performances, motion pictures, performers and recording artists; entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring musical performances, prerecorded music, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, on-line reviews, commentary and articles about music and other multi-media materials; theatrical booking agency services for tickets to cinemas, theaters, shows and concertsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance