USPTO serial 76163307
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
N-0212 Oslo, NO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Lasky
MICHAEL B LASKY ALTERA LAW GROUP10749 BREN RD E OPUS 2MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55343UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES INCLUDING MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER AND MOBILE DATA COMMUNICATION DEVICES; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATION CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK INCLUDING MOBILE GLOBAL DATA CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION, NAMELY, SENDING AND RECEIVING OF MESSAGES, SOUND, DATA, IMAGES AND SPEECH; PROVIDING AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE FEATURING TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK INFORMATION FOR CUSTOMERS; WAP-BASED SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPING AND PROVIDING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES THAT USE WIRELESS NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL PLANNING AND CONSULTATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL AND GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; DATA COMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND FOR ADDITIONAL CONNECTION TOWARDS MOBILE GLOBAL DATA NETWORKS AND OTHER MOBILE DATA AND TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |