USPTO serial 76163600
NAKED SPORTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NAKED SPORTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL HERBERT
PAUL HERBERT RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT LLP2 BLOOR ST E STE 1800TORONTO, ON M4W 3J5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's and women's clothing, wearing apparel, accessories and footwear, namely, anoraks, aprons, boots, belts, ballet shoes, bath wraps, bib overalls, ski bibs, blouses, bodysuits, bath robes, blazers, bathing suits, baseball shirts, baseball uniforms, briefs, brassieres, capes, cardigans, culottes, cravats, coats, camisoles, chemises, collars, dickies, dresses, dressing gowns, ear muffs, foulards, fur cloaks, fur coats, fur jackets, fur stoles, garters, girdles, gloves, headbands, hoods, hosiery, hats, housecoats, kerchiefs, jogging suits, jeans, jackets, jumpers, jumpsuits, jerseys, leg warmers, leotards, lingerie, leggings, mittens, muffs, mantles, mufflers, neckerchiefs, neckwarmers, nightgowns, nightshirts, nylons, nighties, overalls, overcoats, pullovers, pantyhose, parkas, pyjamas, pants, petticoats, ponchos, racing suits, robes, raincoats, running shoes, sneakers, shorts, sweatsuits, shirts, sweaters, socks, swimwear, stockings, shoes, sandals, scarves, shawls, slippers, skirts, sashes, sweatpants, sweatshirts, sweat tops, suits, suspenders, sleepers, sun suits, sweat jackets, sleepers, snowsuits, swimsuits, tank tops, trousers, thongs, tops, tights, ties, toques, uniforms, underwear, underpants, unitards, vests, visors, waistcoats, wristbands, warm-up pants, warm-ups | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |