Drawing for ARM ELECTRONICS

USPTO serial 76163701

ARM ELECTRONICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2990820Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 6, 2005
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARM ELECTRONICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory J. Chinlund

Gregory J. Chinlund MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 6300Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Security equipment, namely, video cameras; housings and mounts for video cameras; power supplies; electrical connectors; monitors; video recorders; video switches; multiplexers; camera lenses; and mounts for video monitorsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJan 4, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2020NCS7NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 7 SURRENDER EMAILED—
Dec 2, 2020C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Nov 25, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 11, 2020C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Aug 11, 2020ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 11, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2014NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2014RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Nov 28, 201489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 28, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 10, 2014E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 10, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 5, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 4, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 4, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 6, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 4, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 4, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 24, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 8, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance