USPTO serial 76163946
LISETTE COSMETICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LISETTE COSMETICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS M GALGANO
THOMAS M GALGANO GALGANO & BURKE300 RABRO DR STE 135HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME, FOUNDATION, BLUSH, MASCARA, EYE SHADOW, LIPSTICK, AND SKIN CREAM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LISETTE COSMETICS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LISETTE COSMETICS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named LISETTE COSMETICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |