USPTO serial 76163991
SALON CALM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2878195Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2004
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SALON CALM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tustin, CA, US
TUSTIN, CA, US
Tustin, CA, US
Tustin, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeana Sciarappa Schott
PALMERI, GLENNA DEE SCIARAPPA SCHOTT IP, PLC36 ANDIAMONEWPORT COAST, CA 92657-1203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care products, namely, body lotion, body cream, face creams, eye creams, facial lotions, eye lotions, fragrant body mist, bath oil, hand cream, skin exfoliating cream, hair shampoo, hair conditioners, styling gels, hair spray, face soap and body soap; cosmetics, namely, eye colors, lip sticks, mascara, powder and liquid makeup and blushes, eye and lip liners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2000 |
| 042 | Hair cutting, removal, styling and coloring services; hair treatment services, namely, hair straightening and conditioning services; cosmetology services, namely, makeup applications and skin treatments; manicure and pedicure services; facial Myotonology services, namely, facial toning of the muscle fibers with micro current electrical impulses and massage services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Palmeri, Glenna Dee
- Other trademarks owned by BRAY, GLENNA DEE
- Other trademarks owned by Palmeri, Glenna Dee
- Other trademarks owned by Palmeri, Glenna Dee
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SALON CALM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 3, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 2, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 21, 2015 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Sep 6, 2014 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 6, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |