USPTO serial 76164276
DESIGN-TO-DELIVERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DESIGN-TO-DELIVERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arnold P. Lutzker
ALLISON L RAPP ESQ LUTZKER & LUTZKER LLP1233 20TH ST NW STE 703WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing a web site in the apparel, electronics, promotional merchandise, toys, retail and global sourcing industries, whereby buyers can be united in order to streamline processes, enhance productivity and reduce costs; Providing clothing designs, clothing design services, clothing patterns and clothing color palettes via a global computer network, providing web hosting and database management services for others; providing computer, technological and consulting services for others via a global computer network in the apparel, electronics, promotional merchandise, toys, retail and global sourcing industries, and in the fields of product, materials and manufacturing sourcing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |