USPTO serial 76164414
1800GREETINGS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2728287Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 1800GREETINGS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS M GALGANO
THOMAS M GALGANO GALGANO & ASSOCIATES, PLLC20 W. PARK AVE., SUITE 204LONG BEACH, NY 11561UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | TELEPHONE ORDERING SERVICES AND ONLINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING [ FLOWERS, FLORAL PRODUCTS, GIFTS, ] ELECTRONICALLY-DELIVERED GREETING CARDS, GREETING CARDS, AND RELATED STATIONERY PRODUCTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 8, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FRESH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FRESH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named 1800GREETINGS.COM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2015 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 29, 2015 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |