Drawing for CHURCHPLAZA.COM

USPTO serial 76165072

CHURCHPLAZA.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CHURCHPLAZA.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L DuPre

JOHN L DUPRE HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, PC530 VIRGINIA RD PO BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing insurance information and assistance to pastors and churches in the field of fire and accident insurance; Financing Services for purchases of church equipmentACTIVEJun 13, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2005SEAPSU - EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Aug 16, 2005SPEASU - EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 14, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 15, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 19, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 9, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 22, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance