USPTO serial 76165092
ISMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3023980Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2005
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ISMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina D. Yates
Christina D. Yates DLA Piper LLP (US)401 B STREET, SUITE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE PRODUCTS FOR MANIPULATING SPATIAL, GRAPHICAL AND OTHER ATTRIBUTE DATA, NAMELY COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CREATING, MAINTAINING, VALIDATING AND ANALYZING BOUNDARY AND POLYGON AND NETWORK TOPOLOGIES FROM NODE, POINT OR GEOGRAPHIC CO-ORDINATE DATA WITHIN A DATABASE AND RELATED TOOLKIT APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, PRE-RECORDED SPATIAL DATABASE COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAM CONTAINED ON CD ROMS OR ELECTRONIC FORMAT FOR GRAPHICALLY INTERFACING WITH APPLICATIONS FROM A DATABASE; SPATIAL AND GRAPHICAL DATA VIEWER APPLICATION SOFTWARE FOR MULTI-USER VIEWING, EDITING AND ANALYZING IMAGERY, VECTOR AND ATTRIBUTE DATA WITHIN A DATABASE; APPLICATION PROGRAM INTERFACES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 14, 2002 |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, MANUALS, BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS ALL RELATING TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE PRODUCTS FOR MANIPULATING SPATIAL, GRAPHICAL AND OTHER ATTRIBUTE DATA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 14, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by e-Spatial Solutions Limited
- Other trademarks owned by e-Spatial Solutions Limited
- Other trademarks owned by e-Spatial Solutions Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named ISMART
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 28, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |