USPTO serial 76165587
LEAN KIDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEAN KIDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Capistrano Beach, CA
Capistrano Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter G Maxwell
WALTER G MAXWELL CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7085UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |