Drawing for KINETIC

USPTO serial 76165637

KINETIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KINETIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael S. Hargis

MICHAEL S HARGIS KING AND SCHICKLI PLLC247 N BROADWAYLEXINGTON, KY 40507-1058UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER FIRMWARE, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CHARGING VALIDATION MECHANISMS AND VENDING MACHINES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR FINANCIAL, FINANCIAL SERVICES, AND PROPERTY MARKETS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROCESSING REAL-TIME FINANCIAL DATA; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SUPPLIED ON-LINE FROM DATABASES OR FROM FACILITIES PROVIDED ON THE INTERNET INCLUDING WEB PAGES; ELECTRONIC BUSINESS PUBLICATIONS RELATING TO SOFTWARE AND SOFTWARE SERVICES, PROVIDED ON-LINE OR FROM DATABASES OR THE INTERNET; CD-ROMS; AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES; AND DIGITAL VIDEO DISCSACTIVE—
016PAPER GOODS AND PRINTED MATTER; PRINTED COMPUTER SOFTWARE MANUALS; AND PRINTED PUBLICATIONSACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE SERVICES; LEASING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; INSTALLATION, DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE AND UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSISACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 14, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 27, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance