USPTO serial 76165708
EATALY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EATALY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
12051 ALBA (CN), IT
20144 Milan, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN C. HOLMAN
JOHN C HOLMAN JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2237UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers not of precious metal or coated therewith namely, soap containers, trash containers, beveragewear, wine bottle cradles, bottle stands, bottles sold empty, bowls, bread boxes, buckets, tea caddies, milk cans, hand-operated coffee grinders, non-electric coffee percolators, containers for food and beverages, thermal insulated containers for food and beverages, containers for household and kitchen use, cups, dishes, flasks, flower pots, tea kettles, lids, metal pans, boxes for paper towels, pepper mills, plates, pots, non-electric pressure cookers, saucepans, saucers, seltzer bottles, serving spoons, tea sets, trays, vessels, corks crews; brushes and brush making materials; articles for cleaning purposes, namely, dustpans, brooms, clothes brushes, crumb brushes, dishwashing brushes, floor brushes, hair brushes, scrubbing brushes, shoe brushes, toilet brushes, shaving brushes, carpet beaters, cleaning clothes, furniture dusters, window dusters, cleaning pads, rising tubs, wipes; beverage glassware, porcelain and earthernwear not included in other classes, namely, jars, mugs, coffee and tea beverage glassware, and vases | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | FABRICS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING AND FURNISHING, CURTAINS, PILLOW CASES, BED SHEETS, BEDSPREADS, BED BLANKETS, COMFORTERS FOR BEDS, BED LINEN, TABLE LINEN, BATH LINEN, TABLE COVERINGS NOT OF PAPER, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TOWELS, TEXTILE PLACE MATS | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND GAME; MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES, JAMS, FRUIT SAUCES; EGGS, MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS, EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; EDIBLE OILS AND FATS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and food preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, ices; honey treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces, spices, ice | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS AND OTHER NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, NAMELY, MALT COOLERS, PUNCH, COLAS, LEMONADE, QUININE WATER, SODA WATERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, EXCEPT BEERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EATALY S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA PRODUZIONI S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named EATALY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |