USPTO serial 76165717
INTUITV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTUITV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison Esq.
DONALD L DENNISON DENNISON SCHULTZ DOUGHERTY & MACDONALD1727 KING ST STE 105ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2700UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cinematographical and checking apparatus and instruments, namely, photographic projectors, cameras and motion picture projectors; electronic decoders, electronic apparatus for data processing; audiovisual telecommunication, telematic apparatus and instruments, namely, television sets, video tape recorders; remote control, tape recorders, video tape recorders, radio apparatus, projectors, car radios, aerials, parabolic aerials, loudspeakers, amplifiers, hi fi system, navigation apparatus between services on data processing network and television frequencies; computers, computers keyboard, computers software for digital television; decoders, encoders; access and access-control devices for data processing, scrambling and unscrambling devices for signals and retransmission; digital terminal, chip card (smart card); electronic card, integrated circuit and micro circuit, card reader, electronic component for computer and decoder; computer monitor for data receipt on worldwide software network, mechanism of simultaneous programming and selection of TV channels, television and radio programs guide, apparatus and instruments for programming and selection of TV programs, apparatuses and instruments for interactive television, namely, software, encrypters, decrypters, printed, integrated and electronic circuits enabling encoding, and broadcasting of digital interactive televised programs; television screen | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Building and reparation, maintaining and installation of audiovisual products, television, software, access control, multimedia interactive | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication, interactive telediffusion services abut the presentation of products, commercial information agency, radio, telegraph, telephone or visiophone communications, communications by television, telediffusion, transmission of information by telematic, transmission of messages, of telegrams, transmissions of images by software, broadcast, diffusion of programmes, particularly by radio, television, videograms and phonograms, data processing network, cable, hertzian way, satellite, rental of apparatus for transmission of messages, terminal unit communications, providing telecommunication connections to the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and industrial researches in the field of digital television, engineering, computer, health, security, construction and information-system consultation services and working out of plans without any connection with the superintendence of works, testing of materials, laboratories, renting of distributor apparatus, printing, rent of access time to a server of data carriers, reporters services, filming on video tapes, management of exhibition areas, conception, elaboration, up to date and renting of computers, software, consultations in the field of computer, of security, software, of telecommunications, audiovisual, computers programming, conception (elaboration) of languages about description of data, of encryption systems, encryption systems, decryption, of access control of television, radiophonic programs and for all transmission of information, conception (elaboration) of programs and interactive apparatus, technical normalization services, technical researches, research and development of electronical, computing, audiovisual, scrambling and access control systems, in the fields of television, computing, telecommunications and audiovisual, secured archiving for electronic supports systems, authentification of electronic messages, rental of access time to telecommunications network, simultaneous programming and selection of television channel services, downloading (uploading) of video games, of financial services of stock exchange services, access supplying to a computer network; television and radio programs electronic guide; and issuing of electronic signals for mounting of cinematographic films | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Canal+ Technologies
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTUITV
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |