USPTO serial 76166078
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Cambridgeshire PE19 3EU, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN G. LINIHAN
MARTIN G LINIHAN HODGSON RUSS ANDREWS WOODS & GOODYEAR1800 ONE M & T PLZBUFFALO, NY 14203-2391UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Microorganisms for industrial and/or public utility use in scientific or research use in analyzing potable water, wastewater, sewage and effluents; Chemicals, namely ammonium salts, magnesium salts, potassium salts, sodium salts including phosphates, sodium hexametaphosphate, ammonium chloride and magnesium sulphate, glucose solutions, glutamic acid, biological oxygen demand (BOD) standard solutions and pH buffer solutions for use in analyzing, measuring and monitoring equipment in the field of water quality monitoring including potable water,sewage and effluents, and wastewater treatment chemicals for use in analyzing, measuring and monitoring waters and rivers, sewage installations, food and beverages and pharmaceuticals | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | microorganisms for industrial and/or public utility use in scientific or research use including NC1MB 9046 pseudomans fluoresceus, NC1MB 11300 bacillus subtilis, DSMZ 772 rhodoccoccus erythropolis and DSMZ 3433 issachenkia orientalis | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Analyzing, measuring and monitoring equipment for waters, rivers, sewage installations, food and beverages and pharmaceuticals and microanallyzers in wafer form and reagent cartridges for use in water quality analyzers | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair and reconditioning services for analyzing, measuring and monitoring equipment for water, rivers, sewage installations, food and beverages and pharmaceuticals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Rental of analyzing, measuring and monitoring equipment, for water quality including potablewater, sewage and effuents; rental of analyzing, measuring and monitoring equipment for water, rivers, sewage installations, food and beverages and pharmaceuticals; consultation services relating to analyzing, measuring and monitoring equipment in the field of water quality including potable water, sewage and effluents; and consultation services relating to analyzing, measuring and monitoring of water, rivers, sewage, food and beverages and pharmaceuticals | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |