Drawing for CHIARO

USPTO serial 76166140

CHIARO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIARO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda M Merritt

LINDA M MERRITT FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2800DALLAS, TX 75201-2784UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING AND OPERATING COMPUTER AND TELEPHONY NETWORKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 1, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 21, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 21, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 21, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 19, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 15, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 17, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 5, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 19, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 4, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance