Drawing for EXPERIENCE SCIENCE PROJECT

USPTO serial 76166152

EXPERIENCE SCIENCE PROJECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRUNO, JAMES
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPERIENCE SCIENCE PROJECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NANCY V. STEPHENS

NANCY V STEPHENS TRADEMARK DEPTFOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC1111 THIRD AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101-3299

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC DATABASE ON THE INTERNET, WIDE-AREA NETWORKS, AND LOCAL AREA-NETWORKS, IN THE FIELDS OF MEDICINE, ENGINEERING, HEALTH, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND MULTIMEDIA PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; MULTIMEDIA COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING WEBSITES ON THE INTERNET FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF MEDICINE, ENGINEERING, EDUCATION, HEALTH, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND MULTIMEDIA PROGRAMMING; WEB-HOSTING SERVICES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING PRODUCT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING SCIENTIFIC AND MEDICAL RESEARCHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 11, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 19, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 21, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance