USPTO serial 76166330
HIGHTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGHTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
R.D.T. INTELLIGENCE SOFTWARE CORPORATION B.V.
1075 AD AMSTERDAM, NL
Other trademarks owned by R.D.T. INTELLIGENCE SOFTWARE CORPORATION B.V.
CURACAO, DUTCH WEST INDIES, NL
CURACAO, DUTCH WEST INDIES, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry L. Kelmachter
BARRY L KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE PC900 CHAPEL ST STE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2802UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Equipment, namely hard disks (HDDs), CDs, DVDs, blank audio and video tapes, integrated circuits, and magnetic storage devices for the recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; magnetic recording media featuring messaging media, groupware, and data base management; optical recording media, namely, CDs, and WORM disks for processing information in the field of messaging, groupware, and database management; computer hardware; computer modems; computer peripherals; multimedia products, namely, voice recorders, pagers, visioconferencing systems for duplex transmission of sound and images comprising Internet provider (IP) networks, microphones, cameras, monitors, image and/or sound encoding and/or decoding devices, electronic mail systems comprising electronic mail boxes, electronic address books, and IP networks, and electronic data files featuring personal or business information; computer software, namely, computer telephony integration (CTI), data management, storage, and authentication software for use in bridging telecommunications devices and information systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Placing advertising for others; business consultation services; providing business information in the field of telecommunications, messaging, groupware customer relationship management (CRM), and enterprise resource planning (ERP); computer file management services; and telephone answering services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely multimedia call control, locally or from a network, including filtering, routing, logging, and notification, unified messaging, contact relationship, pop up files and screens, text-to-text speech, speech-to-text conversion, visioconferencing, namely duplex transmission of sound and images, and multimedia services for cellular phones; communication connections and transfer of data, voice, video and other information via fiber opti-based networks, global computer networks, cable and satellite; providing information on telecommunications via a global computer network; electronic voice messaging transmission services, namely, recording and transmission of information of voice messages by telephone; computer aided transmission of sound and image information via a global computer network; transmission of information via the global computer network; providing multi-user access via a global computer network; and electronic mailbox services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Multimedia entertainment software production services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others; design and development of multimedia products for others; rental of access time to a database server center; rental of access time to a computer for data manipulation; computer consultation; design of software for others; and design of computer servers for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by R.D.T. INTELLIGENCE SOFTWARE CORPORATION B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by HIGHTEL INTERNATIONAL N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by HIGHTEL INTERNATIONAL N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HIGHTEL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |