Drawing for HIGHTEL

USPTO serial 76166330

HIGHTEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGHTEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry L. Kelmachter

BARRY L KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE PC900 CHAPEL ST STE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2802UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Equipment, namely hard disks (HDDs), CDs, DVDs, blank audio and video tapes, integrated circuits, and magnetic storage devices for the recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; magnetic recording media featuring messaging media, groupware, and data base management; optical recording media, namely, CDs, and WORM disks for processing information in the field of messaging, groupware, and database management; computer hardware; computer modems; computer peripherals; multimedia products, namely, voice recorders, pagers, visioconferencing systems for duplex transmission of sound and images comprising Internet provider (IP) networks, microphones, cameras, monitors, image and/or sound encoding and/or decoding devices, electronic mail systems comprising electronic mail boxes, electronic address books, and IP networks, and electronic data files featuring personal or business information; computer software, namely, computer telephony integration (CTI), data management, storage, and authentication software for use in bridging telecommunications devices and information systemsACTIVE—
035Placing advertising for others; business consultation services; providing business information in the field of telecommunications, messaging, groupware customer relationship management (CRM), and enterprise resource planning (ERP); computer file management services; and telephone answering servicesACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely multimedia call control, locally or from a network, including filtering, routing, logging, and notification, unified messaging, contact relationship, pop up files and screens, text-to-text speech, speech-to-text conversion, visioconferencing, namely duplex transmission of sound and images, and multimedia services for cellular phones; communication connections and transfer of data, voice, video and other information via fiber opti-based networks, global computer networks, cable and satellite; providing information on telecommunications via a global computer network; electronic voice messaging transmission services, namely, recording and transmission of information of voice messages by telephone; computer aided transmission of sound and image information via a global computer network; transmission of information via the global computer network; providing multi-user access via a global computer network; and electronic mailbox servicesACTIVE—
041Multimedia entertainment software production servicesACTIVE—
042Computer programming for others; design and development of multimedia products for others; rental of access time to a database server center; rental of access time to a computer for data manipulation; computer consultation; design of software for others; and design of computer servers for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 8, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 24, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 9, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 1, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 2, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 18, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 18, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance