Drawing for INTERNET COMMERCE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.

USPTO serial 76166736

INTERNET COMMERCE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTERNET COMMERCE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sabrina C Stavish

SABRINA C STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, LOCAL, LONG DISTANCE, INTERNATIONAL AND RESIDENTIAL TELEPHONE SERVICES, PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK, COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING, HOSTING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; FOR COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE CONFIGURATION, DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A VARIETY OF WEB SITE MODULES, SUCH AS ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, ADVERTISING AND DISCUSSION GROUPS, PROVIDING INFORMATION AND PRODUCTS OVER THE INTERNET, PROVIDING EQUIPMENT AND CONNECTIONS FOR USE OF THE INTERNET, ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FOR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES -MANAGEMENT AND PROMOTION OF VOCAL AND MUSICAL PERFORMING ARTISTS AND ARTISTIC PERFORMERS, VIA GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK IN THE FIELD OF PRERECORDED AUDIO CASSETTES AND VIDEO TAPES FEATURING MUSIC, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RETAIL SALES OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, CALLING CARD SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, AND INFORMATION VIA COMPUTER; IP TELEPHONY; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE SERVICES USING A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance