USPTO serial 76166785
HOME TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOME TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rosanne T Yang
ROSANNE T YANG BAKER & HOSTETLER, LLP3200 NATIONAL CITY CTR1900 E 9TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114-3475Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY AN ON-GOING AUDIO-VISUAL PROGRAM DISTRIBUTED OVER AUDIO AND VIDEO MEDIA IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES, COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, TOOLS AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Scripps Howard Broadcasting Company
- Other trademarks owned by SCRIPPS NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SCRIPPS NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named HOME TECH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |