USPTO serial 76166988
MONSTERSKATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MONSTERSKATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA
San Clemente, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan M. Friedman
BRYAN M FRIEDMAN FRIEDMAN PETERSON STROFFE & GERARD19800 MACARTHUR BLVD STE 1100IRVINE, CA 92612-2425UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Computerized on-line education and training services, namely interactive tutorials, courses, expert guidance and advice regarding skateboarding and distributing course materials in connection therewith in the nature of how-to guides and tips and techniques; providing facilities for skateboarding tournaments; computer services, namely, providing on-line news columns in the field of skateboarding | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing on-line news columns in the field of skateboarding | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |