USPTO serial 76167150
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Irvine, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Natland, Esq.
Susan Natland, Esq. Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP14th Floor2040 Main StreetIrvine, CA 92614| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE, NAMELY SEMICONDUCTORS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION KITS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, CIRCUIT BOARDS, ANTENNAS, CABLES AND POWER SUPPLIES, FOR USE BY OTHERS TO DEVELOP SEMICONDUCTORS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; SEMICONDUCTORS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; COMPUTER NETWORK HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRONICS DESIGN; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR TRANSMISSION OF AUDIO, IMAGES, TEXT AND DATA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |