USPTO serial 76167275
APTEGRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDINER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APTEGRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah M. Lodge
DEBORAH M LODGE PATTON BOGGS LLP2550 M ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1350UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consultation services in the field of computer networks and information technology systems | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2000 |
| 042 | computer services, namely, web site design and development; web site hosting; design and development of information technology systems; computer systems integration; computer systems implementation; computer systems operation and maintenance; computer programming and software design; design and testing of computer systems; design and development of computer networks; design and development of e-commerce applications; design and maintenance of electronic mail systems; strategic consulting regarding information technology systems; and providing systems engineering services | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |