USPTO serial 76167509
FLEXCHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLEXCHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Folise
MICHAEL J FOLISE RICHARDSON & FOLISE1200 5TH AVE STE 1801SEATTLE, WA 98101-3128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TRANSPONDERS, NAMELY MAGNETIC AND ELECTRIC DATA CARRIERS CONTAINING MICROPROCESSORS OR OTHER ELECTRONIC/MAGNETIC CIRCUITRY FORMING ELECTRONIC LABELS CONTAINING CODED INFORMATION THAT MAY BE ACTIVATED AND/OR SENSED AND READ BY ELECTRONIC SENSORS/READERS; ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR READ-IN AND READ-OUT OF INFORMATION FROM THE ELECTRONIC LABELS AND TRANSPONDERS IN THE NATURE OF ELECTRONIC APPARATUS FOR INTERROGATING THE TRANSPONDERS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE BY THE MICROPROCESSORS INCORPORATED IN THE TRANSPONDERS AND THE ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR READ-IN AND READ-OUT OF INFORMATION FROM THE TRANSPONDERS AND ELECTRONIC LABELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |