USPTO serial 76167510
BRAND BLUEPRINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEJESUS, YSA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRAND BLUEPRINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S. Metteauer
MICHAEL S METTEAUER FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2400AUSTIN, TX 78701-2978UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing and survey services, namely, market research; business marketing consulting services in the field of brand development and business strategies to create brand awareness; conducting marketing studies in the field of brand names, corporate name and tradenames and conducting business and market research surveys | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |