Drawing for CA PHE HANG DAU BUON ME THUOT TRUNG NGUYEN

USPTO serial 76167653

CA PHE HANG DAU BUON ME THUOT TRUNG NGUYEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COREA, ANDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CA PHE HANG DAU BUON ME THUOT TRUNG NGUYEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY J NELSON

GARY J NELSON CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, brewed coffee, coffee beans, roasted coffee, ground coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour, breakfast cereals, cereal based snack foods, bread, pastries and candy, honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder, salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; ice and flavored iceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2004PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
Jan 29, 2004PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance