USPTO serial 76167910
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric D Isicoff
ERIC D ISICOFF ISICOFF & RAGATZ PASTE 800 S TWR1101 BRICKELL AVEMIAMI, FL 33131| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising agency services, namely, promoting clients through radio, television, print and other forms of media for next day sales through the creation of a marketing/business plan from which a specialized five step advertising campaign is created and implemented | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |