USPTO serial 76168005
MOBILISER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOBILISER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1366 Lysaker, NO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori N Boatright
LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVDSEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WIRELESS RADIOTELEPHONES; FACSIMILE MACHINES, MOBILE TELEPHONES IN GENERAL; MOBILE TELEPHONES ADAPTED FOR ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; MOBILE TELEPHONES WITH INTEGRATED PORTABLE COMPUTERS; ELECTRONIC ORGANIZERS; ANTENNAS FOR CORDLESS COMMUNICATION; TELEPHONE TRANSCEIVERS; TELEPHONE ANSWERING MACHINES; HEADSETS FOR MOBILE TELEPHONES; COVERS AND BAGS SPECIFICALLY FOR MOBILE TELEPHONES; KEYBOARDS FOR MOBILE TELEPHONES; DOCKING STATIONS COMPRISING MOBILE TELEPHONE BATTERY CHARGERS AND RECEIVERS; MOBILE TELEPHONE BATTERY CHARGERS; VIDEO TELEPHONES; VIDEO CAMERAS; AND VIDEO RECORDERS/PLAYERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | MAGAZINES IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, MOBILE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES; MESSAGE SENDING BY TELEPHONY; TELEGRAPH SERVICES, PAGING SERVICES, RADIO COMMUNICATION; FACSIMILE SERVICES; MOBILE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES; PROVIDING ACCESS TO THE INTERNET BY TELEPHONE; LEASING AND RENTING OF TELEPHONES; LEASING AND RENTING OF TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |