USPTO serial 76168407
FIREFLY WIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIREFLY WIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arnold S. Weintraub
Arnold S. Weintraub The Weintraub Group32000 Northwestern Hwy Ste 240Farmington Hills, MI 48334-1569UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business and marketing consultation services for businesses in the field of wireless technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Digital and analog wireless telecommunication services, namely, wireless telephone services, wireless facsimile transmission services, wireless data transmission services, wireless PBX services, wireless digital messaging services, and providing wireless telecommunications connections to a global computer network, various content providers, other wireless and wire line service and content providers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |