USPTO serial 76168581
DEEPGROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEEPGROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London EC2A 4QL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin E. Goldstein
MARTIN E GOLDSTEIN DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ANALOGUE AND DIGITAL VIDEO MEDIA; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CD-ROMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS INTENT-TO-USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES FOR OTHERS; BUSINESS AND ADVERTISING SERVICES PROVIDED VIA COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS INCLUDING THE INTERNET; ADVISORY, INFORMATION AND CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING THERETO | ACTIVE | Jun 7, 2000 |
| 042 | DESIGNING COMPUTER PROGRAMS TO ADVERTISE AND PROMOTE PRODUCTS BE IT ON THE INTERNET, BY COMPUTERIZED SLIDE SHOW OR OTHER COMPUTER GENERATED FOR OF MEDIA; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION, INTEGRATION AND ADMINISTRATION; SOFTWARE RESELLERS; ADVISORY AND CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO THE AFORESAID | ACTIVE | Jun 7, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |