USPTO serial 76168873
SOYRICH YEO'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3060559Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 21, 2006
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOYRICH YEO'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M Abel
SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA AVEMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [Milk and flavored milk; milk based beverages; soy-based snack foods, namely, snack food dips; ]soy-based food beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |