USPTO serial 76169050
MCC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MCC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BERNARD R. GANS
BERNARD R GANS JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | SARDINES; FROZEN SEAFOOD AND SEAFOOD CROQUETTES; SOUPS; MEAT BASED ENTREES; AND LENTIL PILAF | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | SAUCES FLAVORED WITH MEAT; PREPARED ENTREES; RICE PILAF; WHEAT PILAF; MACARONI AU GRATIN; SALAD DRESSING; SEASONINGS; SAUCES, EXCLUDING CRANBERRY AND APPLESAUCE; SAUCES USED IN THE PREPARATION OF FOOD PRIOR TO CONSUMPTION; COOKING SAUCES, NAMELY STIR FRY SAUCE, TERIYAKI SAUCE, BAR-B-QUE SAUCE, HONEY MUSTARD SAUCE, AND WOK SAUCE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |