USPTO serial 76169138
GUARDIAN PET PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITCHIE, BRANDEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GUARDIAN PET PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melinda L. Doss
MELINDA L DOSS PITTS AND BRITTIAN, PCP O BOX 51295KNOXVILLE, TN 37950-1295UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC ANIMAL CONFINEMENT SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC ANIMAL TRAINING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF HAND-HELD TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS WORN BY ANIMALS TO ACTIVATE A POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT; ELECTRONIC ANIMAL TRAINING DEVICES, NAMELY HAND-HELD ULTRASONIC SOUND EMITTERS; ELECTRONIC DEVICES TO REPEL UNWANTED ANIMALS, NAMELY STATIONARY ULTRASONIC SOUND EMITTERS, STATIONARY AUDIBLE SOUND EMITTERS, ELECTRONIC BIRD FEEDERS AND ELECTRONIC BIRD FEEDER STANDS THAT ELECTRONICALLY SHOCK UNWANTED ANIMALS; ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR ALL THE FOREGOING SOLD AS A UNIT THEREOF; INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEOTAPES AND MANUALS SOLD AND DISTRIBUTED AS A UNIT WITH THE FOREGOING ELECTRONIC ANIMAL CONFINEMENT SYSTEMS, ELECTRONIC ANIMAL TRAINING SYSTEMS, ELECTRONIC ANIMAL TRAINING DEVICES, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES TO REPEL UNWANTED ANIMALS; ANIMAL TRAINING COLLARS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC BARK CONTROL COLLARS TO ACTIVATE A NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT IN RESPONSE TO A DOG BARK AND INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEOTAPES AND MANUALS SOLD AND DISTRIBUTED AS A UNIT WITH THESE ANIMAL TRAINING COLLARS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |