USPTO serial 76169188
LIFEGRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIFEGRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Virginia Beach, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susanne M Hopkins
SUSANNE M HOPKINS LIFENET7101 BLOOMSBURY LNSPOTSYLVANIA, VA 22553UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | A processed cadaveric tissue graft made from human cadaveric musculoskeletal tissue including cadaveric bone; ligament; tendon; skin, and other cadaveric connective tissue, such tissue used to replace defective or injured tissue in a patient | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | A processed cadaveric tissue graft made from human cadaveric musculoskeletal tissue including cadaveric bone; ligament; tendon; skin, and other cadaveric connective tissue, such tissue used to replace defective or injured tissue in a patient | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |