USPTO serial 76169361
POWER SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWER SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth W Wargo
KENNETH W WARGO QUINN LAW FIRM2222 W GRANDVIEW BLVDERIE, PA 16506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer controlled intelligent power distribution units (PDUs) and basis PDUs for both alternating current and direct current applications with functions of remote control, sequential delivery of power to outlets and monitoring of power load, voltage, temperature and other variables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 6, 2003 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |