USPTO serial 76169411
CELERIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CELERIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis J. Knobbe
LOUIS J KNOBBE KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | DELIVERY OF MESSAGES BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA THE INTERNET AND FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; RADIO COMMUNICATIONS; TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS; TELEGRAPH COMMUNICATIONS; TELEVISION PROGRAMS BROADCAST; BROADCAST OF RADIO PROGRAMS; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION VIA THE INTERNET; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES; SATELLITE TRANSMISSION SERVICES; CABLE TELEVISION TRANSMISSION AND BROADCASTING; TELECOMMUNICATION THROUGH WORLD WIDE WEBS OF COMPUTER NETWORK; RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATION AND MESSAGE TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |