USPTO serial 76169833
E E TURBO TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2007
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with E E TURBO TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chung-Ho City, Taipei County 235, TW
Chung-Ho City, Taipei County 235, TW
Chung-Ho City, Taipei County 235, TW
JHONGLI CITY, TAOYUAN COUNTY 320, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Rabin
Steven M. Rabin RABIN & BERDO, P.C.Suite 500, 1101 14th Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Touch screens, touch display panels used as interactive inputting devices, touch sensors used for integration with display of liquid crystal diodes; light emitting diodes, organism light emitting diodes, integrated circuit boards, liquid crystal diode modules | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by eTurboTouch Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by eTurboTouch Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by eTurboTouch Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ETURBOTOUCH TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named E E TURBO TOUCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 6, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 6, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 8, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |