USPTO serial 76169838
Serial No. 76169838
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76169838?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY P. GOONAN
GREGORY P GOONAN THE AFFINITY LAW GROUPONE AMERICA PLZ600 W BROADWAY STE 400SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless communication apparatus, namely, modems, cellular telephones, wireless local telephones, and personal communication services (pcs) with manuals and accessories, namely fitted carrying cases, belt clips, battery chargers and batteries, and car kits consisting of audio speakers, microphones and external antenna connectors sold as a unit therewith; telephone accessories, namely, fitted carrying cases, belt clips, battery chargers and batteries, and car kits consisting of audio speakers, microphones and external antenna connectors; integrated wireless communication and computing apparatus, namely, modems, cellular telephones, and wireless local loop assistant (pda) devices with manuals and accessories, namely fitted carrying cases, belt clips, battery chargers and batteries, and car kits consisting of audio speakers, microphones and external antenna connectors sold as a unit therewith; and telephone accessories, namely, fitted carrying cases, belt clips, battery chargers and batteries, and car kits consisting of audio speakers, microphones and external antenna connectors | ACTIVE | Mar 17, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |