USPTO serial 76169957
SECUREWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SECUREWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W SCOTT PETTY
AMANDA LAURA NYE KING & SPALDING, LLP191 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30303-1763UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting courses and seminars in the field of network security; computer education training in the field of network security | ABANDONED | Apr 5, 1999 |
| 042 | computer security services, namely, monitoring the security status of computer networks and generating security responses based on network intrusion alerts; managing the scope of network intrusions processed by computer network security systems | ABANDONED | Mar 27, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |